- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1901
ARLINGTON, VA 22704-2490
HD
Docket No: NR&8253-14
9 April 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
~ecord pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
9 April 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary materia
considered by the Board consisted of your application, cogether with
sil material submitted in support thereof anc applicable statutes,
- stots . ies fates he & aa i Sipe =)
TeDusaci ons ana po -LTLes Tm aGdanuion, the Boara consiaered tne
Sisyeit a Rad LB yee a} = We Woanm: Dew 7A _ Axor oe
advisory ovinton Furrnisnec py LAs Wavy Persommelt commena AaAates
amo 6 an sor a 7 = Sond ies a Se = = opera ae ee Se =
2D January BCLE, a copy of which Ls atiacnecs, anc your -S2 Ler aeles
aa
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
“he Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory
opinion. The Board was unable to find the reporting senior could
mot observe your performance properly, nor could it find the summary
group in the contested fitness report was inappropriate. In view
of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision
in this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O* NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR646 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ~ your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6683 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2015. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probabie material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8499 13
You requested removing the fitness report for 14 February to 10 June 2011 and your two rebuttals, each dated 8 June 2011, to the service record page 11 ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 25 May and 1 June 2011, respectively. Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. Since the Board found insufficient grounds to remove either of your failures of selection for promotion, it had...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3348 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and revcedures applicable to the proceedings oF 8» Board. New evidence is evidence the Board prior to making its decision ep in mind that you are entitl reconsider its year from the date of the Bo not previously considered by in this case. rrection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10692 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5123 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) dated 20 October 2014 and the e-mail from HQMC dated 8 September 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12003 14
The Board also considered a COPY of your fitness report for 15 January to 2 October 2010, whose removal was directed by the HOMC Performance Evaluation Review Board, and the HOMC e-mail dated 21 November 2014 (the basis for the PERB action), a COPY of which is also attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3601 14
On 14 January 2008 the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and Reserve Affairs approved-the recommendation of the Acting Director, Personnel Management Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, that you be discharged by reason of the best interest of the service due to a pattern of misconduct, with a general discharge. New material evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13302 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that your commanding officer's decision to impose NJP was appropriate, and it was administratively and procedurally correct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11964 14
You requested completely removing the fitness report tor 14 June to 31 October 2012. your applicacio ogether with all material submivrec Ath support thereo applicable statutes, regulations anc ft the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 27 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when...